About, Contact, FAQ, Hate Mail, Help, Links, Contribute

Conspiracy Science

The Skeptical Inquiry Consortium

Facebook Last.fm Twitter YouTube MySpace

Forums

Welcome to the official Conspiracy Science forums. Be sure to read the rules before posting.

NOTICE: Forums are in beta, especially the layout, so if things are strange or incomplete, they will be fixed later.

The Fed causes all problems

(15 posts) (5 voices)
  • Started 6 months ago by scitops
  • Latest reply from advancedatheist

 

 

Tags:

No tags yet.

 

 

 

  1. advancedatheist
    Member

    If some homeless guy came up to you on the street and asked you Ron Paul's sorts of questions, you would immediately assess him as a mental patient. I can see why some of the more rational conservatives consider him an embarrassment.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  2. Sil the Shill
    Member

    That was quite embarrassing to watch. I love Bernanke's expression around 4:50 in that video.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  3. Apparently Ron Paul thinks inflation and medical expenses are connected, even though the latter has increased far more beyond inflation.

    The video really shows Ron Paul has no idea what the fuck he's talking about.

    Speaking of, I can't really understand what Barney Frank is saying most of the time, he really needs a speech therapist.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  4. advancedatheist
    Member

    Thanks for the link, Edward.

    Seriously, I have to ask: Do some well off people keep Austrian economics going, in defiance of market signals (e.g., private universities' lack of interest in teaching it) as a rationalization for investment scams?

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  5. Hey, now he's claiming the USSR was created by international bankers (see same link).

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  6. advancedatheist
    Member

    Come to think of it, my speculation has some historical support. According to the Wikipedia article about von Mises:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_von_Mises#Professional_life

    Fearing the prospect of Germany taking control over Switzerland, in 1940 Mises with other Jewish refugees left Europe and emigrated to New York City. There he became a visiting professor at New York University, from 1945 until his retirement in 1969, though he was not salaried by the university. Instead, he earned his living from funding by businessmen such as Lawrence Fertig.

    If other universities allowed that, business men could use them as fronts for legitimizing the teaching of whatever crackpot ideas they want, like Intelligent Design.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  7. http://www.gmu.edu/depts/economics/bcaplan/whyaust.htm

    Admittedly, I don't understand a lot of this. But it seems to me the main argument against Austrian economics is that human beings simply aren't rational creatures. It almost reads like most criticism of objectivism that I have read.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  8. scitops
    Member

    When does everybody think the current Austrian economics craze will start to die out? I doubt Austrian economics will go away, however when will its popularity on the internet end? It was popular in the late 70s/early 80s and seemed to go away when the economy improved.

    What will cause it to lose its popularity this time?

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  9. "What will cause it to lose its popularity this time?"

    Peter Schiff getting caught receiving a blowjob in a public men's room?

    One can dream...

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  10. advancedatheist
    Member

    @ scitops:

    When does everybody think the current Austrian economics craze will start to die out?

    I suspect an astroturfing effort keeps it going. The market hasn't exactly rewarded Austrian economists by buying their books in mass quantities:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  11. advancedatheist
    Member

    Over the week end I caught up with a friend I hadn't seen in a few years. He has a Ph.D. in physics, not economics, and he has never worked in banking or finance. Yet he gave me his explanation of the recent financial crisis and how it will lead to catastrophic hyperinflation any day now, an argument with Austrian economics written all over it.

    I didn't want to piss him off by disputing it.

    But I did notice he said something which shows how the Austrian economists keep changing the goal posts. He claimed that historically fiat currencies fail after about 40 years, and he dated the beginning of ours from 1971 when President Nixon decoupled the U.S. dollar from gold:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock

    Uh, I thought the disaster started in 1913, with the creation of the Federal Reserve. According to my friend's 40 year rule, wouldn't that have caused U.S. fiat money to fail circa 1953?

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  12. "Uh, I thought the disaster started in 1913, with the creation of the Federal Reserve. According to my friend's 40 year rule, wouldn't that have caused U.S. fiat money to fail circa 1953?"

    Yes, but despite your friend's apparent competence at physics, he is unable to recognize his incompetence at economics.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

  13. advancedatheist
    Member

    Ironically these Austrian types always talk about the power of incentives; yet they don't explain what incentive banks would have to allow hyperinflation to happen. Hyperinflation destroys the value of loans because debtors can pay them back with depreciated currency, a development which doesn't benefit creditors at all.

    Posted 6 months ago #

     

 

Reply

You must log in to post.